Category: OPINION

  • 통일교–이재명 라인 의혹: 흩어진 퍼즐인가, 감춰진 거래인가?

    [논평]

    한국 정치의 최대 난제는 부패도, 청탁도, 사법 리스크도 아니다. 가장 큰 문제는 ‘본인이 똥인지 모르고 산다는 점’이다. 이번 통일교–이재명 의혹? 이건 사건이 아니라 정치권의 체취(體臭)가 실명 수준으로 번져 나오는 현상학적 관찰기록에 가깝다.

    정진상 쪽에서는 “확인해보겠다”고 하고, 윤–권 라인은 “엄정히 밝혀라!” 하고 있다. 국민이 보기엔 딱 이거다. “응… 니들도 했고 쟤들도 했고, 누가 먼저 걸릴까만 보고 있지?”

    여야가 서로의 목덜미를 물어뜯는 이유는 정말 국민을 위해서가 아니라. “우리가 먼저 잡혀 들어가면 니들도 같이 들어온다”는 공포 때문이다. 그래서 이번 정치판의 진짜 결론은 통일교가 누구를 만났는지가 아니라, “둘 다 만났겠지. 그리고 둘 다 거짓말하겠지.”

    이미 언론에 공개된 사실 중 새로운 건 아무것도 없다. 그러나 정치권은 그것을 마치 어마어마한 비밀문서처럼 들고 서로에게 휘두른다. 정치판의 레벨이 어느 정도냐면,

    • 똥 묻은 개: “저 겨 묻은 개 좀 봐! 더럽지?”
    • 겨 묻은 개: “적어도 나는 똥은 아니다!”
    • 국민: “둘 다 냄새난다. 멀리 가라.”

    문제는 똥 묻은 쪽이 자신이 똥 묻은 줄 모르고, 겨 묻은 쪽은 자신이 겨 묻은 것도 인정하지 않는 데 있다. 그러니 정치권이 외치는 정의(正義), 엄정, 수사, 투명성은 사실상 이런 뜻이다. “법의 잣대는 엄정해야 한다. 단, 우리에게는 적용하지 말아야 한다.”

    윤–권 라인? 정진상–이재명 라인? 둘 다 똑같다. 똑같이 변명하고, 똑같이 책임 돌리고,

    똑같이 “내 잘못 아님” 방패를 든다. 정치판이 서로에게 던지는 말은 도대체 뭐가 다른가?

    윤–권: “이재명 라인, 통일교 만났지? 고백해!” 정–이: “야 너희는 마이크 펜스 데려온 거부터 설명해!” 국민 입장에선 그냥 이렇다. “둘 다 만나고 둘 다 이용하고 둘 다 정치판에서 써먹었잖아?”

    정치권은 ‘부패 의혹’을 가지고 싸우는 것이 아니라 “누가 더 숨겼는지”를 가지고 싸운다. 도둑질은 둘 다 했는데 “누가 더 멀리 도망쳤느냐”로 정당성을 주장하는 셈이다. 그런데 이 싸움의 최종 결론은 다음과 같다.

    문제면 문제고, 문제 아니어도 문제다.

    정치권은 사건을 해결하려는 게 아니라

    서로의 똥 냄새를 더 크게 만들려는 경쟁을 하고 있다.

    윤–권이든 정–이든 단 하나만 확실히 말할 수 있다. “이 바닥엔 ‘청정수’가 존재하지 않는다.” 법의 형평성을 외친다고? 웃기는 소리다. 형평성을 가장 싫어하는 집단이 정치권이다. 형평성이 적용되면 자기들도 다 같이 감옥으로 걸어 들어가야 하기 때문이다.

    그러니 정치권은 온 힘을 다해 이 사건을 ‘상대편만 썩은 사건’으로 만들어야 한다. 그러나 그들이 잊은 사실이 하나 있다. 똥은 냄새로 구분되지 않는다.

    겨는 털어내면 되지만, 똥은 묻으면 인생 간다. 

    국민은 이걸 안다. 정치권만 모른다. 아니, 모르는 척한다. 결국 결론은 이거다.

    “정진상 vs 윤·권성동?

    둘이 서로를 때리는 장면 말고,

    둘 다 목욕탕으로 들어가는 장면을 보고 싶다.”

    이게 100%다. 정치권 전체에 대한 동등한 모욕과 동등한 풍자, 그리고 국민이 느끼는 날선 진실 그대로.

    참고문헌

    • KBS, SBS, TV조선 등 관련 뉴스 보도(통일교 접촉 의혹 관련).
    • 윤영호 전 본부장 녹취록 관련 국회·특검 브리핑 자료.
    • 국내 주요 정치해설 프로그램 및 시사패널 발언 정리.
    • 세종연구소·평화연구기관 발표 자료 중 통일교 해외 네트워크 분석.

    Socko/Ghost

  • 노상원 플리바게닝 폭로: 던져진 칼날은 尹-李 누구를 겨냥했나?

    [논평]

    이번 사건의 결론은 이미 정해져 있다. 없는 사실을 요구한 특검보다, 그 거짓말이 진실이길 바라는 정치권이 더 위험하다는 것. 노상원이 폭로한 건 단순 회유가 아니라 한국 정치·사법 시스템 전체가 ‘진술 장사’라는 불편한 현실이다.

    이 사건에서 진짜 문제는 누가 조작했느냐가 아니라, “조작이 있을 법하다”는 말이 너무 자연스러운 나라라는 점이다. 노상원이 겨눈 칼은 특정 정치인이 아니라 이 판을 굴리는 모든 손이다. 이제, 그 칼이 누구부터 베어 들어가는지 살펴보자.

    1. 노상원은 왜 지금 칼을 뽑았는가 — ‘타이밍’이 모든 걸 말한다

    노상원 전 정보사령관의 폭로는 우발적 분노가 아니다. 이건 정밀 계산된 정치·사법 시스템 교란이다. 왜냐하면: 

    • 올해 8월 민주당 주도로 플리바게닝 제도 개편
    • 개편 후 첫 대형 폭로
    • 진술 신뢰성 붕괴 → 특검 정당성 붕괴 → 정치 프레임 전체 붕괴

    그는 “지금 터뜨려야 가장 큰 파괴력”임을 정확히 알고 있다. 이는 단순한 ‘억울함 해소’가 아니라 “네가 만든 제도로 네가 무너지는 장면”을 연출한 것이다. 이보다 더 아이러니한 복수가 있을까.

    2. 특검이 정말 회유했느냐?

    그보다 더 중요한 건 정치권 전체의 ‘반응 방식’이다. 노상원이 주장한 핵심:

    • “윤 대통령·김용현 관련 네 가지 진술을 해주면 처벌 감경해주겠다.”
    • “다이어리 내용을 조작해 달라 했다.”
    • “나머지 세 가지는 아예 존재하지 않는 새로운 사실을 만들어 달라 했다.”

    여기서 중요한 점은 이 폭로가 사실인지 아닌지가 아니다. 정치권이 즉시 보인 반응이 문제다. 

    민주당: “특검에 대한 공격이다! 방해 작업이다!”

    국민의힘: “봐라! 특검이 조작하고 있다!”

    특검: “절대 사실이 아니다.”

    언론: “누가 더 신뢰성이 있어 보일까 계산 중.”

    즉, 모두가 노상원의 발언을 “진실 여부”가 아니라 “정치적 이용 가치”로 평가했다. 이것이 바로 세상소리가 말하는 한국 정치의 원죄: 진실보다 ‘유용함’이 먼저다.

    3. 이화영–이재명 대북송금 재판과의 연결

    노상원의 폭로는 증언 구조 자체를 흔든다. 노상원 폭로의 파급력은 단순 특검 비판을 넘어선다. 왜냐하면:

    • 이화영 사건도 핵심은 “증언과 진술의 신뢰성”
    • 이재명 리스크도 “진술 중심 수사 구조”
    • 민주당 8월 플리바게닝 개편도 “진술 거래의 제도화”

    노상원은 법정에서 말했다:  “진술하라, 아니면 불리해진다.” 이 한 문장은 이 사건과 이화영 사건, 내란 사건, 대북송금 사건을 하나의 선으로 꿰는 연결고리다.

    그래서 노상원의 폭로는 특정 진영만이 아니라 증언 기반 수사 구조 전체를 흔든다. 그의 증언은 마치 이렇게 말하는 것과 같다:

    “너희는 진술로 정치를 하고, 진술로 사람을 죽이고, 진술로 판결을 만든다. 그 진술의 바닥을 내가 보여주겠다.”

    4. 국외 사법재판 고발 건과의 연결

    국제 기준에서 보면 ‘놀랄 것도 아니다’가 더 큰 충격.

    국제 인권 기준에서 보면:

    • 회유
    • 허위 진술 강요
    • 증언 조작
    • 검찰·특검의 거래

    이것은 중범죄다. 그런데 한국에서 이 말이 나오면 “새로운 폭로”가 아니라, “아 맞아, 그럴 법하지”가 되어버린다. 이 자연스러움이야말로 노상원이 폭로한 가장 잔혹한 진실이다.

    5. 노상원의 ‘진짜 노림수’ — 특정 진영이 아닌 ‘판 자체를 무너뜨리는 칼’

    노상원은 보수의 편도, 진보의 편도 아니다. 그는 자기 생존을 걸고, 판 자체를 기울게 만들고 있다. 그의 노림수는 세 가지다.

    ✔  ① 특검 무력화 — ‘내란 서사’ 파괴: 특검이 무너지면 내란 프레임은 자체 소멸한다.

    ✔ ② 민주당 리스크 상승 — 제도 개편의 역풍; 민주당이 만든 플리바게닝 개편은 지금 노상원의 손에서 민주당을 되치기하는 칼이 된다.

     ③ 사법부 자체의 신뢰를 뒤흔듦: “한국 사법은 진술 장사다.” 이 말이 국제 언론에 번지는 순간, 한국 사법부 전체가 흔들린다. 

    그리고 그 혼란 속에서, 노상원은 단순 증인이 아니라 ‘서사의 주도권자’가 된다.

    6. 결론

    ‘조작’은 문제의 본질이 아니다. ‘조작이 당연해 보이는 구조’가 문제다. 노상원의 폭로는 특검을 향한 비난처럼 보이지만, 사실은 한국 정치 전체를 향한 조롱이다. 정치권은 이렇게 말하고 있다:

    • “너는 조작했고, 나는 안 했다.”
    • “너는 회유했고, 나는 정의다.”
    • “너는 거짓말했고, 나는 피해자다.”

    그러나 노상원이 던진 한 문장은 모든 서사를 파괴했다. “너희는 모두 진술을 도구로 삼아온 사람들이다.” 그래서 이 사건의 아이러니한 결론은 단 하나. 누가 조작했고, 누가 회유했는가가 아니라, 그 조작을 믿고 싶어 하는 정치권 전체가 이미 조작의 세계 안에 있었다는 것.

    노상원의 칼날은 특검도, 민주당도, 국민의힘도, 사법부도 피해가지 않는다. 그는 판을 뒤집으려 한 것이 아니라, 판이 얼마나 썩었는지 보여주려 했을 뿐이다.

     

    참고문헌

    • 전한길뉴스(1waynews) 내란 관련 방송 발췌
    • 법률신문 플리바게닝 제도 개정 해설
    • 이화영 대북송금 재판 법정 기록 언론보도
    • 한국 사법제도 국제비교 연구자료
    • 주요 일간지 및 시사프로 검증 보도
     

    Socko


  • 기술은 인간을 어디로 데려가는가 — 변화의 시대, 우리는 이미 미래의 초입에 있다

    by Socko / Ghost | NEWSVOW Opinion Desk

    어떤 시대든 인류는 늘 “미래는 두렵다”고 말했다.
    그러나 역사는 매번 증명해왔다.
    미래는 두렵지만, 미래는 결국 우리를 더 나은 곳으로 데려간다.

    2025년 오늘, 우리는 기술혁명의 정점이 아니라 시작점에 서 있다.
    AI, 재생에너지, 생명공학, 우주 기술, 초연결 사회까지—
    기술은 단순한 도구가 아니라 인류가 다음 단계로 진화하기 위한 새로운 생태계가 되고 있다.

    그리고 이 변화는 생각보다 더 밝고, 더 따뜻하고, 더 인간적이다.


    ■ 1) AI, 인간을 대체하는 것이 아니라 인간을 확장한다

    많은 사람들은 AI가 인간을 대체할까 두려워하지만, 실제로 일어나는 현상은 정반대다.
    AI는 우리의 감각·능력·기억·창의력을 확장하는 확장적 파트너 역할을 한다.

    • 시각 장애인은 AI 카메라로 세상을 더 풍부하게 본다.
    • 노인들은 음성 기반 AI를 통해 외로운 시간을 대화로 채운다.
    • 창작자는 AI와 함께 상상력을 현실화한다.
    • 학생들은 인공지능 선생님으로 맞춤형 교육을 받는다.

    AI는 인간의 자리에서 경쟁하지 않는다.
    인간이 도달하지 못한 자리로 손을 잡아 끌어올린다.


    ■ 2) 기술의 다음 무대는 ‘삶의 질(Life Quality)’ 향상이다

    과거 기술은 속도, 크기, 효율을 위해 존재했다.
    하지만 지금의 기술은 한 가지 목표를 향한다.

    “더 좋은 삶을 만들어라.”

    예컨대—

    • 스마트 의료는 질병을 조기 진단하고 치료 비용을 줄인다.
    • 재생에너지는 낮은 전기료와 깨끗한 환경을 만든다.
    • 자율주행은 교통사고를 획기적으로 줄인다.
    • 스마트 농업은 기후 위기 속에서도 안정적 식량 공급을 돕는다.

    기술은 이제 ‘산업의 수단’이 아니라
    인간 생활의 품격을 끌어올리는 동반자가 되었다.


    ■ 3) 우리는 지금 전례 없는 ‘시간의 선물’을 받고 있다

    기술은 단순히 일을 대신해주는 것이 아니라
    인간에게 **시간(Time)**을 돌려준다.

    기계가 할 수 있는 일을 기계가 해주면,
    인간은 그 시간을

    • 배우고,
    • 쉬고,
    • 사랑하고,
    • 창의적으로 사용하고,
    • 성장하는 데 쓸 수 있다.

    기술은 인간에게 계속 묻는다.

    “당신은 되찾은 이 시간을 어떻게 쓰겠습니까?”

    이 질문이야말로 미래 시대의 최고 선물이다.


    ■ 4) 기술의 진짜 가치는 연결(Connection)이다

    세계는 이제 기술로 연결된 하나의 거대한 공동체다.
    언어는 자동 번역으로 사라지고, 거리는 화상 통화로 지워지고,
    지식은 누구나 접근 가능한 공유 자원이 되었다.

    이 연결성은 새로운 문명의 토대를 세운다.

    • 개발도상국 학생도 세계 최고 대학의 강의를 듣는다.
    • 전쟁과 재난 현장은 AI가 분석해 인류가 함께 대응한다.
    • 해외 전문가와 로컬 기술자가 한 프로젝트를 실시간으로 진행한다.

    기술은 벽을 허물고, 다리를 만들고, 인류를 하나의 흐름으로 묶는다.


    ■ 5) 결론: 기술은 인간을 기계화하지 않는다. 인간을 ‘더 인간답게’ 만든다.

    기술이 발전할수록
    우리는 점점 더 사람의 마음, 사람의 감정, 사람의 가치에 집중하게 된다.

    왜냐하면 기술이 아무리 강력해져도
    인류를 움직이는 근원은 여전히 사람이기 때문이다.

    따뜻함을 만들고, 공동체를 만들고, 의미를 만들고,
    이야기를 쓰는 존재는 언제나 인간이었다.

    미래는 차갑지 않다.
    미래는 빠르지만, 그 속도는 인간을 위한 속도다.
    기술은 인간의 적이 아니라,
    우리를 다음 단계로 인도하는 든든한 조력자다.

    우리는 그저
    미래를 두려워하지 않을 용기만 갖추면 된다.

    Opinion by Socko / Ghost
    NEWSVOW | Future & Technology Desk
    Email: sockopower@gmail.com

  • 그들은 왜 ‘침묵의 정치’를 선택하는가 — 균열의 시대, 말보다 위험한 것은 ‘말 없음’이다

    by Socko / Ghost | NEWSVOW Opinion Desk

    한국 정치든 세계 정세든, 요즘 가장 흥미롭고 동시에 기묘한 흐름이 하나 있다.
    바로 **“침묵하는 권력”**이다.
    예전 권력은 떠들었다. 외쳤다. 과시했다. 존재를 드러내야 살아남는 구조였다.

    그런데 2025년의 권력은 거꾸로 간다.
    말하지 않는 것이 더 큰 말이고,
    움직이지 않는 것이 더 큰 움직임이며,
    부재가 곧 메시지가 된다.

    대한민국 정치판도 그렇고, 북한도 그렇고, 미국·중국·러시아도 비슷하다.
    도대체 왜 지금, 권력은 침묵을 택하는가?


    ■ 1) 말 많은 시대일수록 권력은 적게 말한다

    지금은 한 마디만 잘못 나와도 세계 시장이 흔들리고, SNS 알고리즘이 폭주하고, 여론의 칼날이 순식간에 달려든다.
    권력에게 “말”은 더 이상 정보가 아니라 위험 자산이 되었다.

    그래서 권력은 최대한 말하지 않는다.
    해석은 국민이 하고, 확증은 언론이 만들고, 책임은 남이 진다.

    이 시대의 권력술은 간단하다.

    “말하면 진다. 침묵하면 산다.”

    그래서 정권도, 야당도, 해외 지도자도, 심지어 독재 정권도
    —조용히 움직인다.
    조용히 흔들린다.
    조용히 재편된다.


    ■ 2) 침묵의 정치, 가장 위험한 것은 ‘무슨 일이 벌어지는지 몰라서’가 아니다

    북한의 침묵은 불길하고, 미국의 침묵은 계산적이며, 중국의 침묵은 전략적이다.
    한국 정치의 침묵은?
    대부분 폭풍 전야다.

    그런데 침묵이 위험한 진짜 이유는 따로 있다.

    사람들은 침묵을 각자의 방식으로 해석한다.
    그리고 오해는 항상 사건보다 빨리 달려간다.

    • 권력이 침묵하면 음모론이 자란다.
    • 기업이 침묵하면 시장이 흔들린다.
    • 안보 기관이 침묵하면 국민이 불안해한다.

    침묵의 시대는 결국 해석 전쟁의 시대로 이어진다.


    ■ 3) 지금 대한민국은 ‘침묵의 난맥상’을 겪고 있다

    정치권은 서로의 침묵을 공격한다.
    여야 모두 “말을 안 한다”고 비판하지만, 정작 자신들도 말하지 않는다.

    정부는 침묵으로 위기를 관리하려 하고,
    언론은 침묵 속에서 소리를 만들어내야 한다.
    국민은 그 사이에서 혼란을 겪는다.

    이 구조는 오래 지속되지 않는다.
    침묵은 결국 폭발 혹은 붕괴라는 두 갈래 중 하나로 끝난다.


    ■ 4) 그러나, 침묵은 기회이기도 하다

    폭발 직전의 침묵은 불안하지만,
    전략적 침묵의 순간은 오히려 현명한 선택일 때가 많다.

    • 시장이 공포로 흔들릴 때,
    • 정치가 소란스러울 때,
    • 국제 정세가 급변할 때,

    침묵은 판단 유예의 시간,
    즉, **‘정신을 되찾는 회복 구간’**이 된다.

    문제는…
    우리가 지금 겪는 침묵이
    회복을 위한 침묵인지,
    붕괴 전 증상인지
    아직 모른다는 것이다.


    ■ 5) 결론: 지금 필요한 것은 ‘침묵의 해석력’이다

    2025년의 정치·경제·외교를 해석하는 데 필요한 능력은
    더 이상 정보력이 아니다.
    요즘은 **“빈칸 읽기 능력”**이 지배한다.

    • 말이 없는 공간에서
    • 행간에서
    • 누락된 문장에서
    • 발표되지 않은 자리에서

    우리는 시그널을 찾아야 한다.

    뉴스가 줄어드는 것이 위험한 게 아니다.
    뉴스의 여백이 커지는 것이 위험한 것이다.

    대한민국은 지금, 그리고 세계는 지금,
    바로 그 여백의 시대로 진입했다.

    그리고 여백은—
    해석하는 자 것이 된다.

    Opinion by Socko / Ghost
    NEWSVOW | 세상소리 오피니언 데스크
    Email: sockopower@gmail.com

  • 파라마운트, 월너의 새 친구 되나?

    할리우드 권력판도는 지금 ‘짝짓기 시즌’에 들어갔다

    By Ghost / Socko | NEWSVOW Entertainment & Business Desk

    “할리우드에 진짜 로맨스는 없다.
    오직 자본의 향기만 남았다.”

    최근 미국 엔터테인먼트 업계를 흔드는 가장 뜨거운 질문은 이것이다.
    “파라마운트는 과연 월너 브라더스(워너브라더스)의 새 친구가 될 것인가?”

    표면적으로 보면 기업 M&A 뉴스이고,
    조금 깊게 보면 스트리밍 전쟁의 후폭풍이며,
    본질은 **‘콘텐츠 자본주의의 생존 전략’**이다.


    ■ 1) 디즈니·넷플릭스가 다 먹은 시장… 남은 건 ‘합치기’뿐이다

    전통 미디어는 이미 한계를 돌파했다.

    • 케이블은 끊기고

    • 극장은 부진하고

    • 광고 시장은 파편화되고

    • 제작비는 천정부지로 올랐다

    이 상황에서 파라마운트+나 HBO Max(현 Max)가
    넷플릭스·디즈니+와 정면 승부?
    **“이길 수 없는 싸움”**이 이미 증명되었다.

    그래서 남은 전략은 단 하나—
    “친구 만들기”, 즉 합병 또는 전략적 제휴다.

    파라마운트는 그동안
    애플, 아마존, 스카이댄스와도 이야기를 나누었으나
    가장 파장이 큰 조합은 역시 파라마운트 × 월너다.

    왜?

    이 둘은 콘텐츠의 DNA 자체가 할리우드 정통파이기 때문이다.


    ■ 2) 파라마운트가 얻는 것: ‘생명 연장’

    월너가 얻는 것: ‘콘텐츠 무기력증 해소’

    파라마운트는 오래된 명가이지만 이제는
    재무구조가 빠르게 말라가는 상황이다.
    블록버스터 몇 편으로 버티기엔
    스트리밍 손실 규모가 너무 크다.

    반대로 월너는 Discovery와 합병 후
    조직은 비대해졌지만
    콘텐츠 수급이 흔들리고 있다.

    즉—

    • 파라마운트는 체력을 잃었다.

    • 월너는 콘텐츠 공급력을 잃었다.

    둘이 손을 잡으면?
    서로의 빈 칸이 메워지는 그림이 나온다.

    “서로가 서로에게 필요한 시기”.


    ■ 3) 할리우드는 지금 ‘골드러시’가 아니라 ‘세이프티 모드’다

    지금 벌어지는 판도는 골드러시가 아니다.
    수익이 줄어든 시장에서 생존하려는 구조조정이다.

    • 넷플릭스는 ‘한 집 살림’ 구축

    • 디즈니는 구조조정

    • 아마존은 스포츠 투자 강화

    • 애플은 전략적 선택에 집중

    그리고 파라마운트와 월너는 생존을 위한 고위험·고보상 전략을 준비 중이다.

    이 조합이 성사되면
    유럽·아시아 시장에서 넷플릭스와의 싸움은
    조금이나마 균형을 되찾을 수 있다.


    ■ 4) 그러나 문제는… 미국 정부가 좋아할 리가 없다는 점

    바이든 행정부는 독과점에 매우 민감하다.
    특히 미디어·통신 산업은
    “여론시장”이라는 정치적 민감도가 있다.

    월너와 파라마운트의 결합은
    합쳐서 할리우드의 절반 규모가 되어버린다.

    즉, “친구”가 될 수는 있지만
    정작 정부가 둘을 갈라놓을 수도 있다.

    할리우드판 로미오와 줄리엣이 탄생하는 셈이다.


    ■ 5) 결론: 콘텐츠는 왕이지만, 왕도 돈 없으면 퇴위한다

    파라마운트와 월너의 손잡기는
    단순히 로고 두 개가 합쳐지는 문제가 아니라,
    스트리밍 시대가 초래한 새로운 미디어 생존전략의 발현이다.

    우리는 지금
    할리우드 왕조 시대의 끝자락을 보고 있을지도 모른다.

    앞으로의 승부는
    개별 스튜디오의 힘이 아니라
    얼마나 큰 플랫폼과 얼만큼 빨리 연합하느냐에 달려 있다.

    파라마운트와 월너의 “썸”은
    결과가 어떻든
    이미 변화의 신호탄이 되었다.


     

    Commentary by Socko / Ghost
    NEWSVOW | Entertainment & Business Commentary
    Email: sockopower@gmail.com

     

  • Matt: Happy Birthday Kinsey

    Yesterday I had the great honor and privilege of attending a colleague’s 70th birthday party. You may not have heard his name before, but Kinsey Wilson has been at the center of shaping journalism with a movie-worthy career that started at the bottom as a crime reporter in Chicago, and has taken him to the highest echelons at NPR, the New York Times, and, most recently, we’ve been lucky to have him at Automattic.

    Kinsey brings a journalistic curiosity and passion for finding truth, paired with a deep optimism and creativity for seeing around the corner for how technology can transform how we consume and produce media.

    While his Wikipedia page or biography provides appetizers to some of what he’s done, Kinsey has led such a rich and beautiful life that any attempt to summarize it ends up being criminally reductive. The best you can hope for is to give a taste of his person through vignettes.

    A beautiful snippet from the montage of accolades at his birthday was how Kinsey was someone you’d follow into battle. I’ve learned so much from seeing the empathy, candor, and integrity he brings to every team he leads, which engenders an incredible loyalty I’ve rarely seen in my career. When he left NPR, 62 colleagues made an “Infinite Kinsey” website of accolades.

    That sort of thing is rare, and it’s been an honor and a privilege to work alongside him to democratize publishing.

    One of those colleagues, Elise Hu, introduced us while he was at the New York Times and while my intention when I first met him was to get more WordPress at the Times, my imagination was sparked by thinking of how he could bring his experience to help shape WordPress and Automattic, hence my pivot into recruiting him.

    Kinsey’s impact on journalism (and podcasting!) at NPR and New York Times is easy to understand, but less well-known is how he came into Automattic and got deep into understanding WordPress and seeing it as a platform that could enable the newsrooms and journalists to accomplish their mission in a more efficient way with the project he leads, Newspack.

    He’s a fierce steward of the Fourth Estate.

    Newspack and its team’s close relationship to customers invents solutions on top of WordPress that delight its users and percolate and influence everything we do at Automattic. They’re one of the teams that sets the bar for others in the company.

    To Kinsey, I’ll leave you with a quote from one of my other inspirations, Charlie Munger, who at the tender age of 99 shared a wish with a visitor, “Oh, to be 86 again.”

    I’ll try not to be too tech-bro optimist and say that 70 is the new 40, but I look forward to seeing the ripples that you have on the future of publishing for many years to come.

  • Topher DeRosia on How Public Contributions Shape Careers in WordPress

    Transcript

    [00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

    Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress. The people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case, how public contributions can shape careers in WordPress.

    If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

    If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you, or your idea, featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox, and use the form there.

    So on the podcast today we have Topher DeRosia. Topher is a web developer with over 30 years of experience, and he’s been deeply involved in the WordPress community for the past 15 years. He’s attended nearly 80 WordCamps around the world, contributed to projects like HeroPress, and has made it his mission to highlight the power and value of open source and remote work, especially in the WordPress ecosystem.

    In this episode, Topher joins me to talk about the value of working in public, and how sharing your work openly can create unexpected and lasting opportunities. Whether that’s boosting your career, finding a sense of purpose, or building connections across the globe.

    We start with Topher’s personal journey, discovering the WordPress community and the profound impact it has had on his life and family. The conversation explores what makes open source communities, like WordPress, so unique, and while working transparently can lead to moments of serendipity and even job offers from people who have seen your contributions many years before.

    Topher shares stories about giving back, the motivation that comes from helping others, and the long-term satisfaction that comes from being generous with your time and expertise.

    We also discussed the tension between the philanthropic and commercial aspects of WordPress, and how individuals and companies navigate that balance.

    Towards the end, Topher reflects on building a body of work over time, trusting in the slow and organic process instead of seeking instant influencer success. He explains why he still chooses to create and share resources for free, motivated by the hope of helping the next person just starting out.

    If you’ve ever wondered about the power of sharing your work, finding meaning in open communities, or how to make a difference over the long term, this episode is for you.

    If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

    And so without further delay, I bring you Topher DeRosia.

    I am joined on the podcast by Topher DeRosia. Hello.

    [00:03:19] Topher DeRosia: Hello there.

    [00:03:20] Nathan Wrigley: It’s very nice to chat to Topher. We’ve done this before. We’ve had many chats online, but I just want to pay a special thanks to Topher for reasons I won’t bore the audience with, Topher has sort of joined me at extremely late notice, like minutes of notice.

    We had a bit of back and forth yesterday about topics that we may cover, and the one that’s going to be covered today is the one that we decided. But he wasn’t expecting this, and so he’s arrived and I’m extremely grateful. So firstly, my deepest thanks for carving out a bit of your day unexpectedly.

    [00:03:50] Topher DeRosia: You’re very welcome. This is always fun, and fit my day perfectly.

    [00:03:53] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, okay. Thank you. So what we decided to talk about was, and I’ll encapsulate it in a sentence that Topher wrote to me, and then we’ll just sort of get into it and see where we go. Topher said, he’d like to talk about the value of doing things in public, and how this can come back to you later as a way of potentially, I don’t know, boosting your career or just offering some guiding light to the community and what have you.

    So first of all, in order to give us some idea, I’m sure that there are people who know you, having listened to the things that you’ve done or consumed the HeroPress website or what have you. Will you just give us a little potted bio of yourself related to, I guess the WordPress community, makes most sense in this context?

    [00:04:30] Topher DeRosia: Sure. I have been a web developer for 30 years, which is old, but I got into WordPress about 15 years ago and I did not know there was a community for several years. And Brian Richards said to me, hey, we should do a WordCamp. And I said, what’s a WordCamp? And then of course, my life changed forever after.

    Oh, you know what? We started with a meetup, but like 2 weeks later he said we should do a WordCamp. And he said, we should do it this summer. And we were talking, like we were talking in June. So we went from never hearing of it before, to having a WordCamp suddenly. And I’ve been in, all in on the community ever since. I’ve been to nearly 80 WordCamps, all over the world. I’ve been making stuff, building stuff, meeting people ever since.

    [00:05:12] Nathan Wrigley: Wow.

    [00:05:13] Topher DeRosia: It’s pretty great.

    [00:05:13] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, 80. Gosh, that’s profound. I mean, I don’t consider myself to have a high attendee account, but 80, that really is remarkable.

    So I think it’s fair to say that the profundity of the effect of discovering that community is pretty important in your life. You know, it’s had a material impact in every way.

    [00:05:31] Topher DeRosia: Hugely. My wife got into the community. My children, both my kids have spoken at WordCamp US. My wife has spoken. My kids have friends in other countries that I don’t know because of the WordPress community. Every parent has that fear of, what if something happened to us? What would happen to the kids? And we have family that would take care of them, you know? It’s nice to know we also have that backup where there are people all over the world who would say, hey, we got room, come on.

    [00:05:55] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, that’s pretty amazing. I joined the WordPress community, so I’d been involved in lots of open source projects, things like Magento and Drupal and things like that. And I know that Drupal has, there’s definitely stuff in the Drupal space that you can attend. But I never did.

    And to be honest with you, I didn’t know that that stuff existed until after the fact. And then in about 2014, something like that, I discovered WordPress. And just like you, I had no conception that it was more than some downloadable bit of software. Honestly didn’t even know that it was done by volunteers. I just had probably some assumption that there was an organization or a company behind it that in some way monetised it and made it free and what have you.

    And then just got this intuition, I guess, with social networks, the way that they were at that time, you could find groups and discover that there were all these ancillary groups of people doing things with WordPress, you know, groups focusing around page builders and groups focusing around plugins.

    And then for me to discover that there were actual events that you could attend was, just like you, really remarkable. And I attended the first one and I kind of thought, oh, we’ll just see how this goes. I’m a bit of an awkward character in person, so I sort of stood around at the back. But it didn’t take me long to sort of be welcomed in. And just like you, completely changed my life. And ever since then, a sizable proportion of my free time has been devoted to curious WordPress things. It’s amazing.

    I can’t quite work out what it is about a project like WordPress that inculcates that, fosters that, makes that possible. Because I imagine if you attended, I don’t know, a Cisco networking conference or something like that, it’s not going to have the same feel. So I don’t know if you want to speak to that for a little bit, why you think the community works.

    [00:07:36] Topher DeRosia: Yeah. I have two thoughts about it. One is that I think it’s absolutely because of the people. And it may be chance that the right people found WordPress and got together at the same time. But to that point, that it’s the people, I recently went to two non WordPress conferences in one week.

    I went to one for higher education in technology. The people who attended were from universities and colleges, and they were looking for ways to manage web stuff on their entire campus. So do you offer a blog to all 24,000 students, you know? That kind of thing. It was my first time there, but I saw a number of people who were greeting each other and not having seen each other since last year, and the year before, and the year before. And it was very much like a WordCamp. And people talked about how this group is so wonderful and they wait all year long to come back here. And I thought, oh, okay, so this is WordCamp.

    And then while I was there, I met somebody who worked at Umbraco, which is an open source .net based CMS. And they’ve been around for 20, more than 20 years, but it’s a very small community, like 0.01% of the market share. And I told her, you know, who I am, what I do, and she’s like, oh, we would love to have you come to our conference this weekend in Chicago. Can I pay you to come? I was like, oh wow, sure.

    So I went and it was about a hundred people and it was WordCamp. Everybody there loved the software, loved the community, everybody was friends. It was the same. And expanding just a little more, HeroPress says it’s about people leveraging WordPress to make their lives better. But in actuality, what it is, is open source and remote work combined. It allows people in Malaysia to pick up software and compete on a relatively equal basis with somebody in New York. And in our world, that’s WordPress. But it’s exactly the same with every open source remote work option, Drupal, Umbraco, anything.

    [00:09:45] Nathan Wrigley: Maybe open source then is, forgive me, the secret sauce. Maybe that’s the component, the bit that binds those communities together in a way that perhaps, I don’t know, something where a proprietary thing or something was locked down, or profit was the whole point, maybe that is the bit. The fact that there’s a bunch of people gathering together in a kind of philanthropic way. You know, there’s no expectation that my attendance will definitely lead to finance, let’s put it that way.

    Like I said, I don’t really have much experience outside the WordPress world, and so my assumption was that there was something a little bit unique. But from what you’ve said, this same exact thing is happening probably a thousand times over throughout the globe, but your expectation there is that the open source component is the bit, the bit that unlocks it.

    [00:10:32] Topher DeRosia: Yeah, I agree. WordPress has the advantage of a very large user base, which is good and bad. There are certainly more wonderful people in it than if there were fewer. But at that scale, you are just as likely to have really terrible people. I know people that have left the WordPress community because they’ve been treated horrendously, abused, and it breaks my heart. And I want to say, oh, WordPress is different, you won’t find that here, but you will. It’s too big a community to not have that.

    [00:11:01] Nathan Wrigley: I wonder what it is then about that sort of spirit of giving back that creates some kind of, I don’t know, hive mind, for want of a better word. You know, there’s just this ethic that you’re all combined on this slightly higher purpose. So in the case of WordPress, and you mentioned Drupal and you mentioned the other CMS with the small market share, the principle there is that you’re working on something, and I guess publishing is the point. You are enabling people who may or may not have a voice to get on the internet and do something, publish something, write something, put images, videos or what have you.

    There is some kind of higher calling there. It’s very hard to sort of grasp that, and to really understand it. But do you know what I mean? You’re doing something which, at the end of your days, you can look back and say, there was something there. There was something meaningful, there was something significant and important. And that feeling, that thing, whatever that thing is, is important, and enough to propel people to give up hours and weeks of their lives to do this.

    [00:12:04] Topher DeRosia: I think most people enjoy making other people, I don’t know, so many things, more successful, happier, more stable. And there are open source projects that will shrivel up and die because no one ever says thank you. People work on a project for years and years and they think, you know what? Nobody cares. I’m going to go play Frisbee.

    But I think the WordPress community is large enough, and we have these events that everybody goes to, that you run into people who have been impacted by the work you do.

    There’s a, boy, can’t remember his first name. Heisel. He’s Dutch but lived in England and now he lives in Malta or something. Anyway, I met him for the first time at WordCamp London and he walked up to me and said, hey, I need to shake your hand. I said, okay. He said, a few years ago I lost my job and I didn’t know what I was going to do and I needed to support my family, and I got on OS Training and learned WordPress from your videos, and now I support my family with WordPress. I about broke down in tears right there.

    And that kind of thing happens to lots and lots of people. People who say, you know what? This plugin you wrote, it changed my life. I make a living with this now. I support my family.

    [00:13:19] Nathan Wrigley: Do you know what’s kind of interesting there is that, I guess you did none of it with the expectation of that person wandering up. You know, it’s not like, Topher, you sat down and thought, the more thanks I get, the more I’m going to do. There isn’t that kind of expectation. But it certainly helps, doesn’t it? When somebody does come up and express those thoughts to you. I bet you that carried you through the next days, weeks, or months. You know, the capacity to drag that out of your brain.

    [00:13:42] Topher DeRosia: It still is. That was years ago.

    [00:13:43] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, yeah. Isn’t that interesting?

    [00:13:45] Topher DeRosia: I do think though that you don’t do it for the thanks, but it’s a lot easier to do if you think it matters. When people say thank you, it feels good, but it lets you know that what I’m doing matters. It’s making a difference. It’s making somebody’s life better. It’s making the world better. That’s a huge motivator.

    [00:14:04] Nathan Wrigley: That’s the big thing. So this is a curious question, right? And it’s not really related to WordPress. Did you have those same intuitions at an early age? Was there some part of you can remember even as, I don’t know, let’s say a 15-year-old or 17-year-old or something like that. Where you had already made the leap that life is better when you are being helpful? Or did you learn that later?

    Because I kind of have the intuition that quite a few people in our community probably figured that out at some point fairly early on. And it enables them, I’m obviously not suggesting that people who didn’t make that intuition early on can’t join the community or what have you. But I’m surrounded by people who seem to have this almost bottomless capacity to give. And I’m always struck by how did that begin for them? Where did that start for them? So because I’ve got you on the line, I’m asking you directly.

    [00:14:58] Topher DeRosia: When I was in college, I just randomly became interested in motivations. What makes people do things? What makes somebody mean all the time? What makes somebody happy all the time? What makes somebody be kind?

    And I thought through the process of how gratitude is an influencer. If you say to somebody, thank you for what you’re doing, it makes them feel good. It makes them want to do it more. If they’re, you know, working at a food pantry and you say, hey, thank you for what you’re doing, it’s changing lives, just feeding children. It makes them want to do that more. If that person at a food pantry were faced every day with angry people who abused them verbally and stuff like that, they’d be a lot less inclined to do that.

    [00:15:37] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. I listened to a podcast not that long ago, and I actually can’t remember which one it was because I listened to several in this line. But essentially it was trying to peel back the latest studies in what causes some people to be happy. And I am not going to explain this and have the expectation that everything I say is true, nor that this is the limit of that. But a fairly reliable indicator of happiness, whatever that means, but on a fairly profound level, happiness can be boiled down to these two things, apparently.

    One of them is that you are giving of your time. So it may be that you are, as you say, working in a soup kitchen. Or that you are doing something in the community. Or you are just putting into your children or what have you. There is a real connection apparently between the capacity to give something from which you expect nothing in return. Humans apparently find great, deep satisfaction from that.

    And the other one is friendship. If you have people that you regard as friends, on a deep level. So obviously acquaintances, we can all have many, many thousands of those, especially online nowadays. But it’s that core little group of really impactful, meaningful people who in the time of crisis, you know are going to have your back.

    Those two things apparently are a real predictor of one’s happiness. And both of them seem to stray into our community, you know? Although it’s an online thing, you’re still giving your time, and you know that in a fairly ephemeral way that you maybe can never grasp, people will be benefiting from that. And also you make friends. So there you go, it’s the root to happiness.

    [00:17:19] Topher DeRosia: It is.

    [00:17:20] Nathan Wrigley: So all of that, having said all of that, you have this wealth of experience in the community. You’ve done so many projects in the community. And as I said at the top of the show, the thing that you wanted to talk about was, not just the mere fact of doing things in the community, but about the fact that you are doing things in the community in a sort of public way, and how that can sort of impact in the future. So just tell us a little bit about why you wanted to get into that, or maybe some anecdotal evidence of how that’s helped you.

    [00:17:50] Topher DeRosia: Very little of it in my life has been deliberate. I’ve done some things and then later thought, oh, wow, I didn’t realise that this would be the consequence. I made videos for OS Training for a lot of years, they’re behind a paywall, they paid me by the video. I wasn’t thinking, oh, I’m going to go teach the world. It was a client, I made videos.

    And years later, Brin Wilson from WinningWP got a hold of me on Post Status and said, hey, I want to start a YouTube channel. Would you make videos for me? I said, sure, but why me? He said, well, I’ve seen your work. You’ve done this, you have given evidence to the world that you know what you’re doing. And that was a good contract. And I got it because I had previously done something else.

    With HeroPress, I didn’t set out to become a relatively known person. I was just doing it. But I remember the first time I talked to a stranger from India and introduced myself and they said, oh, of course we know you. I said, what do you mean of course? You live 5,000 miles away from me. How on earth would you know me? And, boy, it is just stuff like that.

    I have some plugins on wordpress.org. I think cumulatively they have 12 installs. They’re not big plugins, but they’re there. And people look and say, oh, Topher knows how to make plugins.

    I contribute to the photos project. And people who aren’t necessarily contributors don’t necessarily understand the different kinds of contribution. They just see my name on the contributor list like, oh, Topher builds WordPress because I take a lot of photos or something. But just the fact that I’m out there doing that makes a difference.

    I’ve been blogging for years. I did blogs in the GoDaddy Garage back in the day, I wrote on OS Training, I wrote all over the place. And recently I thought, boy, I wish I had had all that on my own site.

    And then it occurred to me that WordPress does a lot of RSS, and so does YouTube. And so I built a site called topher.how. Found everything I’ve ever done and just used WP All Import and pulled it all into one place. So now at topher.how you can see stuff I’ve done decades ago, and it’s nice. It’s a place to say, look, here’s stuff I did. But I have gotten, no, you know, I’m not going to say I’ve gotten jobs, I’ve gotten consideration, interviews, interest because people who know who I am, because I did something once long ago.

    [00:20:11] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I guess the interview phase, to get yourself over the line, you’ve still got to sort of show your metal, haven’t you? But that whole thing of just being represented by your past, it’s really curious. We live in a world which is so dominated by, I don’t know, the financial motivation for this, that, and the other.

    It is curious when nowadays you can have a legacy which is not the CV, it’s not the line items on the CV. It can be much more ephemeral stuff. Things that you did, videos that you made, blogs that you contributed to.

    The people out there making the decisions about who’s going to get those jobs, well, you have proved that that kind of history of being online definitely works, and in unexpected ways. It’s not like there’s always a through line between, okay, I’m going to make these YouTube videos so that in a few years time I’ll have this credible body of evidence that will make it so that anybody can employ me. It’s much more ephemeral than that. It’s more, I’m doing this video because I think itll be helpful, and then serendipitously that then leads to something in the future.

    [00:21:14] Topher DeRosia: Yeah, very much so. Before we started recording, you mentioned my background here. It’s a piece of fabric on a photo stand. And I bought it just the other day because, you know, I’ve been making videos for years, I’ve never appeared on camera. Always been a screencast. And I recently got a client that said, well, we want you on camera. And so I got this thing.

    But the interesting part is that the client is a company in Bangladesh. And I know them quite well, they know me quite well because of stuff we’ve done together in the past in the WordPress community. And when they needed videos, they came to me, because they know me and they know that’s what I do. That wouldn’t happen if I hadn’t been out doing stuff years ago. What are the chances I would know somebody, me in Michigan, I would know somebody in Bangladesh?

    [00:22:01] Nathan Wrigley: Right. Right, I mean, the world of 50 years ago, it’s tending to zero basically, you know, unless you’d been on plane or somebody had been on a plane in the opposite direction and you’d met where you are. The opportunities afforded are amazing, and it’s that kind of long tail that you’ve got as well. That I suppose is going to be hard for somebody that’s younger to listen to because, you know, they kind of see this mountain that they’ve got to climb and this great body of work that they’ve got to build up over decades. I guess that’s, it’s not all about that either, it’s about sort of just chipping away at it and doing things piecemeal.

    [00:22:31] Topher DeRosia: I have a funny story about that. Early in my WordPress career, I got to know Pippen Williamson. You may remember him.

    [00:22:39] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. I do.

    [00:22:39] Topher DeRosia: And he was very well known in the WordPress community. I got to know a few people who were very well known. I was like, man, that’s cool, everybody knows these people. Wonder if people will ever know me? We were talking about it, he and I, and he quickly urged me, do not seek to be known because that will only lead to tears. If you’re doing it for the wrong reason, then it will just turn out badly.

    And so I thought, well, you know, maybe in 10 years. Well, here we are. And I didn’t set out to be known. I’ve never bought a banner ad saying, look at Topher. I just went to WordCamp and spoke. I wrote blog posts, I made videos. I shook a lot of hands. I listened to a lot of stories.

    [00:23:18] Nathan Wrigley: It’s about sort of spreading the network organically really, isn’t it? Which I suppose in a sense leads to, okay, rather than the word fame, I’m going to use the word notoriety because I think they’ve got two very different endpoints. But the idea of seeking fame is tied up with, you know, you just want random people to know you because they know you, and that’s the kind of end game, you know? Oh, you are famous because you’re famous, that sort of flavor to it.

    Whereas notoriety for me has much more, there’s a body, a corpus of work behind you that leads to that understanding that, okay, that’s Topher. I know Topher because he did this, this, this, and this. It’s not famous because they’re famous. It’s more, there’s the guy who made those videos that I watched. Or there’s the guy that wrote that blog that I read all the time. That kind of thing. And so it’s not fame for fame sake, it’s accidental fame more, if you know what I mean?

    [00:24:10] Topher DeRosia: Yeah. I heard the term not too long ago that I like called community known.

    [00:24:14] Nathan Wrigley: Okay. That’s nice.

    [00:24:15] Topher DeRosia: Within a community, you you could say famous, very well known. Outside that community, people do not care and have no idea who you are.

    [00:24:22] Nathan Wrigley: That’s right. Yeah, it’s curious, inside of our community, there’s this one person whose name kind of precedes all others, and it would be Matt Mullenweg. But I’m willing to bet that if Matt was walking down the street, more or less anywhere, that his life is just the same as yours and mine. Nobody’s going to know who he is unless randomly they happen to be a WordPresser. But he’s fairly thin on the ground. You know, it’s not like he’s Scarlett Johansson or George Clooney or something like that, where that fame is probably quite an oppressive thing in their life. You know, the capacity to just walk down the street.

    So yeah, anyway, the point being that you’ve done stuff over time without the intention of it being this fame for being famous. It’s more about being community known, as you said. But that has had amazing consequences.

    And that kind of leads me to this next thing. I wonder, this question comes up all the time, but I do wonder if it’s more material now than it ever has been. I wonder if the community can always cope with the commercial pressure that is being born by the community?

    So for example, you know, you up to events and there’s a lot of people trying to sell you things. And maybe WordCamps from 15 years ago would’ve felt very much more a room full of like-minded individuals. Whereas now if you go to WordCamps, maybe there’s more of a feeling of, okay, that bit over there is more commercial, that bit over there is less commercial. But there’s always that kind of commercial angle.

    I don’t really know where I’m going with that, but the commercial side of things, I don’t know if you’ve got a feeling on, or a intuition on that?

    [00:25:54] Topher DeRosia: Sort of. Something I’ve noticed over the years is that it’s entirely possible to write a plugin, start selling it, have it be successful, build a business, hire people, maybe get a relatively large business, maybe hundreds of employees. And it feels good, it looks good, it’s great, it’s wonderful until it starts going, or getting hard. And then people who never thought this would happen start having to make difficult decisions that hurt people.

    If things aren’t going well, we need to let some people go. Maybe we need to let a lot of people go. Maybe we need to reorganise, whatever. And people look at this golden company, the pinnacle of WordPress, open source, love, family, peace, blah, blah, blah, and they’re letting people go. And you think, what? They’re just another business. They were just in it for the money. And they’re not, but it can feel that way when you’ve been let go.

    And at some point it has to be about the money. If you’re building a plugin because you love it and you’re selling it because people need it, that’s cool. If you’re running a business and people are depending on you for their livelihoods, you have to make the decisions. You have to do some hard things sometimes. And it’s never going to be comfortable. And at some point it’s going to look like you’re just another company. I’ve never been in this position, but I think it can be incredibly difficult to maintain a culture that we associate with the stereotype of WordPress community, in a full on company.

    [00:27:27] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I do know exactly what you mean. I think we, let’s say for example, let’s go back to Cisco. I used that example a minute ago. Let’s say that I work for Cisco. It’s pretty obvious what the goal there is. The goal is to ship loads of units of networking hardware all over the world, and then next year ship more than we ship this year and innovate more and.

    [00:27:45] Topher DeRosia: And you have investors that are going to hold your feet to the fire.

    [00:27:47] Nathan Wrigley: Right. Okay, so make money, make the investors happy, make the shareholders happy, and so on. That is so straightforward a bargain. But we in our community have this extra layer underpinning it of this philanthropic bit, which forms the basis of it. It’s literally the bedrock of it.

    And so that whole thing is propping everything else up on top of it, which I genuinely don’t know how the shifting sands of that all work. We’ve managed to get through 22 years plus, of that building up slowly over time, there being arguments here, there and everywhere. Minor arguments, some bigger arguments. We’ve somehow worked it through.

    But I don’t suppose that will ever get perfectly resolved. It’s going to be just part of the understanding that if you’re in open source, there’s a commercial bit. And if you can’t cope with that, well, that’s something you’re going to have to think about and look at. But also there’s going to be this whole philanthropic side, and that has to carry on and has to be funded, and figured out, and made important and advertised and all of that. I don’t have the brain to figure all that out, but it’s part of the jigsaw puzzle.

    [00:28:52] Topher DeRosia: Yeah. It’s truly something I’ve never had to deal with, and I hope I don’t, the scales of money. I had a job once when I was very young. We’re at home, we were newly married and money was tight, and we were talking about where to get $20 for groceries and things like that.

    And at work I was allocating hardware for new employees and, oh, let’s pick up two or three extra computers at $4,000 each because we might need them. That scale of money is, it’s something I’ve tried to be aware of.

    I look at a WordPress plugin company that has employees and I think, oh man, you have so much more money than I do, so much more. And maybe they do, but they also have so many more bills than I do. Just because they have several employees, and they’re doing well and things look great on Black Friday, doesn’t mean that they’re super wealthy or anything.

    [00:29:42] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. I genuinely struggle with this component. I don’t think I’ll ever resolve it. I’m just aware that it exists. I’m aware that there’s people who are very polemic about it. There are people on the far this side, and there’s people on the opposite side who maybe are kind of struggling to shout across the gap. But then there’s people sitting in the middle who are somehow managing to figure it all out, or at least be sanguine about it, and not worrying too much about it. Time will tell. In the year 2026, I’m sure that it won’t get figured out, but it will probably carry on.

    I’ve got every hope that WordPress is exciting enough to carry on and that people will continue to use it. So I don’t worry too much about that. It’s just more whether or not the two sides of the argument, in an increasingly polemic world, whether the commercial side of WordPress and the non-commercial side of WordPress can figure out some way to walk upon the same path.

    [00:30:28] Topher DeRosia: There’s an element to WordPress that I think will carry on, even if it looks like WordPress is starting to fail. And that’s going to be the earliest people, the smallest contributors. Things have been really shaken up in WordPress in the last year or two, and I have friends who’ve left the community. And business is getting bigger and WordPress itself is changing. Gutenberg is a big thing now and AI is moving in and all that. So much is changing.

    And I have people say, why do you stay? Why do you keep doing WordPress? Specifically, why do I keep doing HeroPress? And I think my experience tells me that there will always be a 17-year-old picking up a computer at the library for the first time and discovering WordPress and starting a new life. And I want to be there for that person.

    [00:31:18] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. So it’s going back to the 17-year-old you as well. You know, that bit that we had earlier where you figured out you had this intuition that there were some things in life which mattered more.

    One of the things that I think is really, like it’s so difficult to square this argument though, the whole thing where you see incredible wealth being generated by WordPress and you see incredible endeavors being put into WordPress by people who are really struggling to make ends meet. And I simply don’t have the capacity to figure out the solution to that. I cannot square that circle. But that is such a bit of cognitive dissonance that so much wealth is generated, on the one hand, and yet so much of the foundational work is created by people who may be struggling to put food on the table and what have you. And that is really challenging.

    [00:32:12] Topher DeRosia: Yeah, it is challenging. I don’t think it’ll ever be solved. I think it’s a universal problem of humanity. But similar to other areas, I think WordPress does better than other communities. There have been a bunch of discussions in the past about inclusivity, diversity in the WordPress community. And even people who point out the problems and say, look, we messed up here, this is bad, we need to change it, will say WordPress is probably the best of the IT world. There are problems. It’s bad. There are things we need to change, but we’re way ahead.

    [00:32:47] Nathan Wrigley: Okay, so that’s a really, sorry to interrupt. I got really caught up in what you just said then. I wasn’t expecting that to hit me quite as hard as it did. That was really interesting. That sort of sanguine approach to it. It’s never going to be perfect. We’re probably going to have division and factional fighting, I’m going to do air quotes around the word fighting, but you know what I mean, like infighting and what have you. But we do all right. Given how it could be, it’s okay. These things are just a part of the evolution of it. It’s a journey, not a destination. Yeah, that was interesting.

    [00:33:18] Topher DeRosia: We do have to take care though to not rest on our laurels, as it were. To say, oh, you know what? It’s okay, we’re better than everybody else, and so we don’t need to work on it. As soon as we do that, then we will not be better than everybody else.

    [00:33:30] Nathan Wrigley: And it’s curious because I think the people that I end up talking to when I attend things like WordCamps have that intuition. I think some, on some innate level, they get the bit that you just said. They know that it’s not perfect. And they know that work needs to be done. And they’re there for that thing. They want to fight the good fight, and make it so that this platform is available to the 17-year-old that you just described, so that they can pick this stuff up and publish their own stuff online, and have their own voice, and create their own identity and all of that. And it’s, yeah, really interesting.

    I think I have one more question. So we were talking about the impact of you doing stuff in the open. You obviously did all of that stuff in the open. You did everything, you put everything online, you got HeroPress and all of that kind of stuff. Would you still advocate that in the year 2025, 2026? Do you still think that’s probably the best way forward?

    The reason I’m asking that is because we see so much out there in the world, beguiling stuff. TikTok, YouTube, all these people getting YouTube famous, making giant amounts of money and all of that kind stuff. They’re doing it kind of purposefully in order to gain wealth. So it’s less that philanthropic side.

    If you could replay your life, would you do that? Is there any part of you which thinks you’d go down that route of being the kind of influencer, or are you happy that your life would replay in, if you were the youngster that you were many, many years ago and you were now that youngster, would you still do it the same way, do you think?

    [00:35:00] Topher DeRosia: I think I would. A couple years ago I did a video tip of the week on HeroPress. It was a video on YouTube. And people would say to me, you know what? It’s good that you offer this free stuff. You should put something behind a paywall and make money off it. And I think, oh, you know, that’d be cool. I could make money and pay the bills. But then I think, anything I put behind a paywall is not going to be able to help a 17-year-old who’s making a dollar a week. And that’s where my heart is. And I struggle.

    I’m doing a project right now that I would love to tell you about. Over the years, I’ve done support a lot. And I, early on, made a rule, if I get asked a question more than three times, I’m making documentation. And so I can just say, oh, here, go check this out. And over the years I’ve had many clients come back to me three months after I built a site and say, you know, you taught me how to use the WordPress admin and I don’t remember, can you show me again?

    So, I don’t know, a year ago I thought, I’m going to make a course for beginners, and it’s going to have videos that are one minute long about how to make a link, how to put in a picture, how to edit your form. Stuff that we all take for granted every day. But somebody who just got a website three months ago and used it once, they don’t remember.

    So I started down that road. I got MemberPress, I set up a site, and I made a list of videos to make. I was going to sell it to my clients as part of, you know, you bought a website, for an extra X dollars, here’s all this documentation you can have. A WordPresser at that educational conference said to me, I want to sponsor you to make those videos. You pick the topic, but do it on our hosting platform, just so that our name is there.

    And she gave me some money to do it. And she said, I want you to put them on your own YouTube channel. I didn’t have one. All these years, I didn’t have my own YouTube channel for my own videos. I want you to put them on your own YouTube channel, and once you get 2000 subscribers, I will pay you for every video you make. Just to put them on my own YouTube channel. I get to pick the topics. It’s just to get their name out. And I thought, wow, okay.

    So I pivoted, rather than make a course behind a paywall, I am doing this thing, but they’re all going on YouTube. And I started three weeks ago, and I’m putting up a video Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and I have 57 subscribers.

    [00:37:19] Nathan Wrigley: There’s a little road to go. That’s so nice.

    [00:37:23] Topher DeRosia: But this goes back to doing stuff in public so that it’s more significant later. Maybe in a year or two or five, I’ll have thousands of subscribers. And life experience has shown me that I need to not assume that I’m going to have thousands of subscribers within a month. That’s not how this works. You do stuff now, you build your foundation and you grow it. And eventually it gets big.

    HeroPress happened that way. You know, I did a few essays, and I did a few more and I did a few more. And then one day I thought, oh, I have 200 essays, and now I have 300. I never set a goal of how many or anything like that. I just did one at a time, and then suddenly there’s this big site full of stuff.

    And so that’s my current project is to make these videos, helping people figure out how to use WordPress. It’s not going to be just the beginners, it’s going to be, well, have a heart for beginners in any area, so I’m going to do some beginning programming stuff. I’ve built some cool stuff like WP Podcasts, aggregates podcasts. It wasn’t hard. It’s WP All Import, pulling them into the posts type. It’s not that big a deal. But I can make a 10 minute video on how I did that, and some developer’s going to go, wow, I never realised you can do this kind of stuff. So I’m pretty excited about it.

    [00:38:40] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, your life seems to represent that kind of long term approach, and I can completely empathise with that. Obviously my thing is podcasting, and I have the same sort of story that I just began it and kept doing it and kept doing it, and people obviously, you know, found that there was something there for them, or they didn’t.

    But there was something that kept that propelled. And now I look back and there’s a few episodes that I can look back to and, it’s pretty amazing what that brought in its train. Most of it completely unexpected, most of it never intended, and now podcasting in the WordPress space is kind of what I do.

    And it just goes to show, if you do things with the right intention, and you do things for the long game, there is a way to make it work. You know, obviously you’ve got to keep the wolf from the door, and if you live in a part of the world where it’s incredibly important that you earn lots of money in order to just meet the bare essentials, then you’ve obviously got to take care of that at the beginning. But then after that, there’s these opportunities on top of that to sort of grow who you are, grow the community that we’re in. And maybe in the long term, over 2, 3, 5, 10, in your case, probably approaching 20 years in the WordPress space, it has an impact. It’s slowly but surely. Slow and steady wins the game, as they say.

    [00:39:57] Topher DeRosia: It does, yep.

    [00:39:58] Nathan Wrigley: In which case, I will say thank you for that conversation. It was very unexpected and really, really powerful in some regard there. You really made me think on a couple of occasions as we were chatting there, and I really appreciate that.

    So, Topher, where can we find you if somebody wants to see some of the stuff? You’ve already mentioned one. It’s probably topher.how. I don’t know if that’s the one you want to drop again.

    [00:40:17] Topher DeRosia: Yeah, let’s say topher.how. But if you search Google for Topher1Kenobi, you’ll find me pretty much everywhere.

    [00:40:24] Nathan Wrigley: Love that.

    [00:40:25] Topher DeRosia: I’ve never found anyone else use that name.

    [00:40:26] Nathan Wrigley: And it’s the number one, like the numeral one.

    [00:40:29] Topher DeRosia: Yeah.

    [00:40:30] Nathan Wrigley: Not the wan.

    [00:40:31] Topher DeRosia: My personal blog is at topher1kenobi.com. There’s HeroPress. I did an episode the other day with Christos Paloukas, and he said, hey, send me your links.

    [00:40:40] Nathan Wrigley: An essay.

    [00:40:40] Topher DeRosia: I sent him 15 links.

    [00:40:44] Nathan Wrigley: Do that to me as well. Whatever you do send me, then I will put them into the show notes. wptavern.com, search for the episode with Topher. It’s T-O-P-H-E-R. If you just look for that, you’ll probably find it. And thank you so much for chatting to me today. It was very pleasurable. Thank you.

    [00:40:59] Topher DeRosia: Yeah, I had a really good time too. Thanks.

    On the podcast today we have Topher DeRosia.

    Topher is a web developer with over 30 years of experience, and he’s been deeply involved in the WordPress community for the past 15 years. He’s attended nearly 80 WordCamps around the world, contributed to projects like HeroPress, and has made it his mission to highlight the power and value of open source and remote work, especially in the WordPress ecosystem.

    In this episode, Topher joins me to talk about the value of working in public, and how sharing your work openly can create unexpected and lasting opportunities, whether that’s boosting your career, finding a sense of purpose, or building connections across the globe.

    We start with Topher’s personal journey, discovering the WordPress community and the profound impact it had on his life and family. The conversation explores what makes open source communities, like WordPress, so unique, and why working transparently can lead to moments of serendipity, and even job offers from people who have seen your contributions many years before.

    Topher shares stories about giving back, the motivation that comes from helping others, and the long-term satisfaction that comes from being generous with your time and expertise.

    We also discuss the tension between the philanthropic and commercial aspects of WordPress, and how individuals and companies navigate that balance.

    Towards the end, Topher reflects on building a body of work over time, trusting in the slow and organic process instead of seeking instant ‘influencer’ success. He explains why he still chooses to create and share resources for free, motivated by the hope of helping the next person just starting out.

    If you’ve ever wondered about the power of sharing your work, finding meaning in open communities, or how to make a difference over the long term, this episode is for you.

    Useful links

    Topher.How

    Media Forge Productions

    HeroPress

    Hallway Chats

    WP Photos Info

    WP Wallpaper

    topher1kenobe.com

    YouTube

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    Bluesky

    Facebook

    Last.fm

  • The Childhood Factory — And the Adults Who Stop Moving

    By Socko / Ghost | NEWSVOW Perspectives

    There is a quiet factory that every human passes through, though few remember it clearly.
    It is not made of machines or metal, but of moments—small, accidental collisions between curiosity and fear, encouragement and shame. We call it childhood, yet its architecture endures long after we leave it.

    Many adults believe they outgrew that place. They are convinced they became rational, independent agents navigating the modern world through logic and agency. But in truth, most people never walked out; they simply stopped noticing the walls.

    The childhood factory shapes how we respond to uncertainty, criticism, authority, or possibility.
    A child who learned silence as safety becomes an adult who hides brilliance behind modest compliance.
    A child rewarded for perfection becomes an adult who moves only when certain of success.
    A child shamed for mistakes becomes an adult who avoids beginnings.
    A child who survived chaos becomes an adult who interprets peace as suspicion.

    And so, many adults stop moving—not because they lack potential, but because the early machinery continues to run.

    Modern life worsens this freeze.
    Economic instability demands hyper-performance; social media pressures us into polished avatars; workplaces train conformity more than creativity. The result? A generation of adults performing adulthood rather than living it.

    The most tragic part is that people rarely realize the paralysis came from a structure built decades earlier. They blame themselves for a kind of “failure” that was never theirs to own. They believe they lack courage, discipline, intelligence, or talent. But often, what they lack is permission—permission to step out of the childhood factory and rebuild the internal architecture with adult hands.

    We like to think humans grow upward, linearly, predictably.
    But real growth often begins by looking backward.
    Adults regain motion only when they revisit the machinery that shaped them. When they recognize:

    • I learned fear early, but fear is not my identity.

    • I learned to freeze, not because I was weak, but because that was the safest option then.

    • I mistook survival patterns for personality, but they were only strategies.

    The moment that distinction becomes clear, movement returns—not dramatically, but quietly at first.
    Like a frozen river softening under sunlight.

    Some people call this healing, others call it awakening.
    But perhaps the more honest term is reclamation.
    Reclaiming the self from a factory that was never meant to hold adults forever.

    And the beautiful irony is this: once adults begin moving again, they often rediscover something they thought they had lost—childhood, not as a cage, but as a source of imagination and possibility.

    The factory does not disappear.
    But its doors open.

     

    Opinion by Socko / Ghost
    NEWSVOW | Perspectives Desk
    Email: sockopower@gmail.com

  • 물속의 자유, 뒤집힌 청춘의 비극

    세상은 공기 중에서 자유를 말하지만, 정작 많은 청춘은 물속에서야 비로소 숨을 쉬는 기분을 느낀다. 공기보다 무거운 책임, 스펙보다 무서운 비교, 그리고 미래보다 모호한 ‘정답’의 압박 속에서, 물속은 오히려 고요하고, 단순하며, 잔혹하게 솔직하다.

    물속에서는 숨을 오래 참고 버틸수록 내려가고, 내려갈수록 시야가 흐려지다가 끝내 한 줄기 빛만 남는다.
    그 빛은 자유처럼 보이지만, 사실은 생존의 경계에 가까운 경우가 많다. 우리는 그 경계를 ‘도전’이라고 부를 때가 있고, 때로는 ‘탈락’, 혹은 더 냉혹하게 ‘포기’라고 적는다.

    요즘 청춘들이 말하는 “물속의 자유”는 그런 모순 속에서 태어난다.
    지상에서는 아무리 뛰어도 제자리 같은데, 물속에서는 잠시라도 모든 소리가 사라지고, 비교도 멈추고, 책임도 흐려진다.
    그러나 그 자유는 오래 머무를 수 없는 종류다.
    오래 머물면 죽음이고, 너무 빨리 올라오면 다시 현실이다.

    한국 사회는 이 뒤집힌 감각을 이해하지 못한다.
    기성세대는 “왜 숨을 참느냐”고 묻고, 청춘들은 “지상에서는 숨이 안 쉬어진다”고 답한다.
    그러나 둘 중 누구도 틀린 말이 아니다.
    다만 시대가 서로 다른 산소 농도를 강요할 뿐이다.

    그래서 비극은 조용히 시작된다.
    물속에서 잠시 찾은 평온이, 어느 순간 더 깊은 절망과 맞닿을 때다.
    청춘의 ‘자유 실험’이 실패했다고 해서 그들을 탓할 수 있을까?
    물속을 선택하게 만든 사회는 면죄부를 가질 수 없다.

    우리는 이제야 깨닫고 있다.
    물속에서 자유를 찾는 청춘의 비극은,
    사실 청춘의 문제가 아니라 사회가 만든 압력 탱크의 문제라는 것을.

    그리고 물속에서 들리지 않던 그들의 마지막 한마디는,
    막상 물 위에서는 더 크게 울린다.
    “조금만 가볍게 살게 해줘.”

    그 요구는 정치가, 제도가, 그리고 우리가 귀 기울이면 되는 아주 단순한 언어다.
    하지만 한국 사회가 가장 못 알아듣는 언어이기도 하다.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    NEWSVOW | Opinion Desk
    Writer │ Socko / Ghost
    Contact │ sockopower@gmail.com
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  • 취객 너구리, 주류 상점에서 꿈나라로

    주말 새벽, 한적한 시내에 위치한 주류 상점 앞에서 기묘한 ‘취객’이 발견됐다.
    문제의 주인공은 다름 아닌 야생 너구리.

    목격자들에 따르면 이 너구리는 상점 앞에 놓여 있던 빈 맥주 캔과 포장지 주변을 어슬렁거리다, 어느 순간 상점 입구 매트 한가운데에서 폭풍 수면 모드에 진입했다고 한다. 손님들은 “저 정도면 인간보다 더 인간적인 음주 자세”라며 폭소를 터뜨렸다.

    주류 상점 점주는 “술은 안 샀지만 분위기는 취했다”며 “CCTV 돌려보니 캔을 굴리는 것만으로도 이미 취했던 것 같다”고 말했다.
    현장에 출동한 관계 기관은 “건강에는 이상이 없지만, 인간 사회의 과음을 지나치게 학습한 것으로 보인다”며 조심스러운 분석을 내놓았다.

    사실 이 장면은 웃고 넘어갈 일만은 아니다.
    도시의 밤, 인간의 생활 패턴과 쓰레기 문화가 야생동물을 **도심의 ‘음주 환경’**으로 끌어들이고 있다는 점에서다.
    우리가 흔히 보던 ‘취객 인간’의 자리에서 이제는 너구리까지 똑같이 눕는다는 것—이것이 지금 우리의 도시 풍경이다.

    너구리는 결국 관계자들의 도움으로 안전한 곳으로 이동됐다.
    그러나 누리꾼들은 댓글에서 이렇게 묻는다.
    “저 친구, 내일 숙취 해소제라도 챙겨줘야 되는 거 아니냐고…”

    매번 인간의 코미디만 보던 세상에,
    이번에는 너구리 한 마리가 조용히 한마디 거든다.
    “너희만 힘든 줄 알았냐.”

    Socko / Ghost

    sockopower@gmail.com